I read the introduction and realized that this is not a book for me. Cruelty to animals disgusts me.
Some have likened this book to a bit of Peter Pan mixed in with Lord of the Flies. Certainly, there's a never-never aura to it and the prominent role of Emily might remind one of Wendy. But all that is quite superficial. Reference to Lord of the Flies Has a good deal more validity, but still somewhat misses the point. What we have here is first and foremost a writer who manages to immerse himself in the mobile minds of children to a remarkable degree. The child's awareness of events; her interpretation of the relative importance and meaning of those events; a child's perception that is often completely at odds with that of an adult beholding the same occurrences: grasping all of that and putting it into coherent words is surely quite a feat.
As for the story itself, it's a rambling one and ultimately of little consequence. Hughes strikes me as not a very good story teller; actions are abrupt, sometimes disjointed and far from convincing. Rather, the true substance of this book lies in its exploration of the personalities, both child and adult and their state of mind. In the end, I found it a bit creepy, which is not what I expected.
Good book, but creepy. Quite dark. Disney meets Stephen King.
Written in 1929 - written about childhood but not for children. This book is on the Modern Library's List of top 100 novels.
whiteshadow13 thinks this title is suitable for 18 years and over
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.